Should animal testing be banned?



All you need to know about the world this 
week
SEE ALL ISSUES
EDITOR'S LETTER
Our world this week
FEATURE
Myanmar's forgotten people
FEATURE
Tensions in northern Syria reach new heights
FEATURE
Could Lithuania’s Russian hostilities really turn into conflict?
FEATURE
Good times: is the world economy back in full swing?
www.bbc.co.uk
The Japanese porn star who taught China about sex
www.middleeasteye.net
Egypt's 'fourth pyramid' Mohamed Salah: 'He is one of us'
www.wired.co.uk
The strange, untold story of CES, the trade show that refuses to die
www.aljazeera.com
Why some African Americans are moving to Africa
www.theguardian.com
Islamists banned their music. Now Timbuktu is singing again
www.theatlantic.com
The Rise and Fall of Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage
DEBATE
PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS
Should animal testing be banned? 5

Humans have long experimented on animals to test new medications and cosmetic products. Given the level of suffering inflicted on animals in the process, there is little doubt that such experimentation is inhumane. As such, outlawing the testing of cosmetics on animals would seem to most an uncontroversial position. The EU has already done just that. But what about when it comes to life saving drugs? Is animal suffering the price that must be paid to ease human suffering? How reliable is the data that can be gathered from testing cures designed for people on other species? Are scientists doing enough to reduce the harm caused to animals? Are there more humane alternatives? And as with so many ethical questions, can it be reduced to the greatest good for the greatest many?

read more
Share Opinion
LATEST
LEADING
L
Add bio
contributions - pts
Submit
A journalistic initiative Sponsored by:
american-express-sponsor
About this
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.
OK