Should extremists be banned from public discussion platforms?



All you need to know about the world this 
week
SEE ALL ISSUES
EDITOR'S LETTER
A new era
NEWS FEATURE 1
Culture wars: How the French Left is taking on Marine Le Pen
NEWS FEATURE 2
Little celebration on El Salvador's first murder-free day in two years
DIGEST AMERICAS
‘Justice has been served’ Obama declares as he sets Chelsea Manning free
DIGEST EUROPE
Brexit: Theresa May finally speaks
DIGEST EUROPE
How a single train almost derailed the Kosovo peace process
DIGEST EUROPE
Facebook or Fakebook? Germany takes on misinformation
DIGEST ASIA-PACIFIC
Will President Duterte impose martial law in the Philippines?
DIGEST ASIA-PACIFIC
South Korea: East Asian phoenix?
DIGEST AFRICA
Is one of Africa's oldest dictatorships about to fall?
DIGEST AFRICA
In a surprise move the US eases sanctions on Sudan
DIGEST AFRICA
After Syria, Russia looks to Libya
DIGEST MIDDLE EAST
Gaza erupts as the lights go out
THE PICTURE
Riding back to medieval times
GOOD NEWS
The world’s biggest companies vow to tackle plastic waste
Obama donates $500m to UN’s Green Climate Fund
THE  INFOGRAPHIC
Healthcare around the world
IN SCIENCE
Are flying cars about to become a reality?
IN MEDICINE
Why are galaxies dying out?
IN TECHNOLOGY
Immaculate Conception? The extraordinary case of Leonie the shark
www.middleeasteye.net
Hands speak: Turkish rappers create fusion between hip hop and sign language
roadsandkingdoms.com
Drinking with Bears in Ukraine - Roads & Kingdoms
www.theguardian.com
Refugees risking lives to reach bright lights of Johannesburg
theintercept.com
What the “Santa Clausification” of Martin Luther King Jr. Leaves Out
www.newstatesman.com
What does the end of the one-child policy mean for China's disabled population?
graphics.latimes.com
In Mexico's fields, children toil to harvest crops that make it to American tables
DEBATE
POLITICS
Should extremists be banned from public discussion platforms? 3

Calls to no-platform controversial figures have come to the fore in recent years, as the world experiences a rising tide of populism, theocratisation, and alt-right movements. Though many claim that refusing to host extremist speakers jeopardises freedom of speech, some media outlets, university unions, and debating organisations stand by their bans, especially with regard to Islamists who are often tied to anti-Semitism.

Those in favour of no-platforming argue that inviting representatives of extreme religious or socio-political views only ends up giving them mainstream legitimacy. In the wake of far-right leader Marine Le Pen’s highly controversial Remembrance Day appearance on the Andrew Marr Show in the UK, or the WikiLeaks revelations that the US Democratic Party sought to promote extremist Republican figures on the mistaken assumption they’d discredit themselves, there is a growing correlation between influential airtime and the rise once-fringe currents that have proven detrimental to harmonious communal relations - as shown by the spike in hate crimes. But the risk of no-platforming for liberals is that the banned figures gain traction and sympathy as “victims” or “outsider” figures, whose messages of truth are being censored by the establishment. Should opinions from every degree of the political spectrum be given equal and free airing? Are some views just too extreme? And how should democratic systems aspiring to political balance manage fringe entities?

read more
Share Opinion
LATEST
LEADING
L
Add bio
contributions - pts
Submit
A journalistic initiative Sponsored by:
american-express-sponsor
About this
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.
OK