Should vital matters of peace and economic prosperity be decided by public referendum?



All you need to know about the world this 
week
SEE ALL ISSUES
EDITOR'S LETTER
Feeding the war machine
NEWS FEATURE 1
Stuck in the desert: Displaced Syrians struggle in sealed off camp
NEWS FEATURE 2
Chechnya’s gay persecution: Could Ramzan Kadyrov’s time be running out?
DIGEST AMERICAS
Will Brazil face a new impeachment crisis?
DIGEST AMERICAS
Venezuela marks 50 days of bloodshed
DIGEST AMERICAS
Trump’s budget hints at looming healthcare battle
DIGEST EUROPE
Britain reels from the deadliest attack in over a decade
DIGEST EUROPE
Greece’s financial future is cast in doubt after bailout talks fail
DIGEST ASIA-PACIFIC
In a first in Asia, Taiwan legalises same-sex marriage
DIGEST ASIA-PACIFIC
A new anti-conspiracy bill stirs controversy in Japan
DIGEST ASIA-PACIFIC
Philippine President Duterte declares martial law on Mindanao
DIGEST AFRICA
Poor Ugandans could lose mobile phone access
DIGEST MIDDLE EAST
Trump in the Middle East: Going back to the old days
THE PICTURE
Almost heaven, West Virginia
GOOD NEWS
California sets a new record for renewable energy generation
Researchers make progress in search for malaria vaccine
THE  INFOGRAPHIC
The money behind the weapons
IN SCIENCE
Is flammable ice the fuel of the future?
IN MEDICINE
Experts draw up rules for real-life star wars
IN TECHNOLOGY
Superhuman Sherpas could help treat hypoxia
www.theguardian.com
Facebook Files | News | The Guardian
www.theguardian.com
Mexico's avocado army: how one city stood up to the drug cartels
www.aljazeera.com
Then and now: Finding love during the Khmer Rouge
DEBATE
POLITICS
Should vital matters of peace and economic prosperity be decided by public referendum? 9

This week, the Colombian people delivered a shock to their government by voting to reject the peace deal with FARC that stood to end five decades of conflict. In doing so, they made their voices clear on the future of their country, but they may have also jeopardised it by rejecting the deal negotiated by the government. Similarly, in Britain this year, the people were consulted for the first time in over four decades on membership of the European Union, voting to leave despite the vast majority of experts predicting painful economic consequences. For Swiss people, referendums on all manner of policies are a part of ordinary political life, and have generally functioned relatively smoothly, but when they rejected free movement it left the country tied up in knots over its agreements with the EU. In many instances, representative democracy has left people feeling shut out of the political process, especially when politicians go back on the promises that got them elected. But referendums can often be derailed by media bias, spin and the pull of populism. And on vital issues of peace and economic prosperity, in which votes can often be led as much by the heart as by the head, should the public be the ones who make the final decision with so much at stake? Or is it patronising to assume people are not qualified to have a direct say in the future of their nation?

read more
Share Opinion
LATEST
LEADING
L
Add bio
contributions - pts
Submit
A journalistic initiative Sponsored by:
american-express-sponsor
About this
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.
OK